State v. Hendren’s Empirical Analysis
1981
Citation profile
9 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 10 later decisions — most recently September 2005
9 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Illinois v. Allen · Snyder v. Commonwealth of Massachusetts · Diaz v. United States · Herring v. New York · Taylor v. United States
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 10 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“1. Felony or misdemeanor. In felony cases the defendant shall be present personally or by interactive audiovisual closed circuit system at the initial appearance, arraignment and plea, unless a written arraignment form as provided in R.Cr.P. 8(1) is filed, and pretrial proceedings, and shall be personally present at every stage of the trial including the impaneling of -the jury and the return of the verdict, and at the imposition of sentence, except as otherwise provided by this rule. • In other cases the defendant may appear by counsel. 2. Continued presence not required. In all cases, the progress of the trial or any other proceeding shall not be prevented whenever a defendant, initially present, does one of the following: a. Voluntarily absents himself or herself after the trial or other proceeding has commenced.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Randle
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.