Schwartz v. Schwartz’s Empirical Analysis
1993
Citation profile
11
cited by 11 later decisions
2
states following
July 2009
most recently cited
9 state decisions
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 1738A
Relies on 32 Cal. 3d 689 - Kumar v. Superior Court · 222 Cal. App. 3d 499 - In Re the Marriage of Arnold & Cully · Sinclair v. Albrecht · Marks v. Marks
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 11 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“(d) The jurisdiction of a court of a State which has made a child custody determination consistently with the provisions of this section continues as long as the requirement of subsection (c)(1) of this section continues to be met and such State remains the residence of the child or of any contestant.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.