Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 311 So. 2d 104 - State v. Ecker

311 So. 2d 104 - State v. Ecker’s Empirical Analysis

1975

Citation profile

150
cited by 150 later decisions
4
states following
July 2024
most recently cited

3 federal appellate · 1 district · 141 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 150 later decisions — most recently July 2024 · most notably 177 Ill. 2d 440 - City of Chicago v. Morales (1997), 471 So. 2d 147 - DA v. State (1985)

3 federal appellate · 1 district · 141 state decisions

550197519801990200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Terry v. Ohio · Chaplinsky v. State of New Hampshire · Papachristou v. City of Jacksonville · California v. Byers · Shuttlesworth v. City of Birmingham

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 150 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “It is unlawful for any person to loiter or prowl in a place, at a time or in a manner not usual for law-abiding individuals, under circumstances that warrant a justifiable and reasonable alarm or immediate concern for the safety of persons or property in the vicinity.”
    41 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “`the police officer must be able to point to specific and articulable facts which, taken together with rational inferences from those facts, reasonably warrant' a finding that a breach of the peace is imminent or the public safety is threatened.”
    26 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. “* * * * * * "* * * to provide law enforcement with a suitable tool to prevent crime and allow a specific means to eliminate a situation which a reasonable man would believe could cause a breach of the peace or a criminal threat to persons or property." (emphasis added) * * * * * *”
    7 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.