¶1The principal and only point involved in this appeal is whether the trial court erred in denying the appellant’s motion for a new trial where counsel for the defendant, appellee herein, made allegedly improper statements in his closing argument. In the absence of the full record in this case, we are unable to determine whether the remarks by counsel were of such inflammatory and prejudicial nature with respect to the testimony adduced in this case as to require reversal.
¶2Affirmed.