Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

311 So. 2d 786

Boyette v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida · decided 1975-05-02

Cited by 3 later decisions — most recently March 1980

3 state decisions

Relies on 294 So. 2d 122 - Estes v. State · 299 So. 2d 146 - Lyles v. State · Jensen v. Kaplan

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1975-05-02

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

PER CURIAM.

¶1Upon consideration of the briefs and record on appeal and having heard oral argument we are of the view that the failure to ascertain a factual basis for defendant’s plea of guilty is not reversible error particularly where, as here, the defendant alleged no prejudice for failure to follow Rule 3.170(j), FRCrP. Accordingly, we affirm upon the authority of Estes v. State, Fla.App.1974, 294 So.2d 122; Hall v. State, Fla.App.1974, 303 So.2d 417; but see Lyles v. State, Fla.App. 1974, 299 So.2d 146.

¶2Affirmed.

WALDEN and MAGER, JJ., and MOE, LEROY H., Associate Judge, concur.
/311/so2d/786 · .json · Public domain