¶1David Cerf, Jr., Miami, for appellant.
¶2Tew, Tew & Murray, Miami, for appellees.
¶3Before PEARSON, HENDRY and HAVERFIELD, JJ.
¶4PER CURIAM.
¶5Plaintiff-appellant seeks review of the trial court's order dismissing plaintiff's amended complaint for improper venue.
¶6The trial court having determined (1) that defendant Curtis, the only defendant served in this action, did not reside in Dade County, and (2) that no allegations in the complaint made it appear that any cause of action accrued in Dade County, we conclude the trial court was correct in dismissing the subject complaint for improper venue with leave to refile same in Alachua County, the residence of defendant Curtis, or such other county that plaintiff would choose. See § 47.011, Fla. Stat., F.S.A. and Larson v. Cooper, Fla. 1954, 75 So.2d 757; Florida Real Estate Commission v. Bodner, Fla. 1954, 75 So.2d 290.
¶7Accordingly, the order herein appealed is affirmed.
¶8Affirmed.