Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 311 U.S. 138 - American United Mut Life Ins Co v. City of Avon Park Fla

American United Mut Life Ins Co v. City of Avon Park Fla’s Empirical Analysis

311 U.S. 138 · 1940

Citation profile

391
cited by 391 later decisions
26
cited 26 times by the Supreme Court
3
states following
September 2017
most recently cited

129 federal appellate · 24 district · 8 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 391 later decisions (26 by the Supreme Court) — most recently September 2017 · most notably Burford v. Sun Oil Co. (1943), Woods v. City Nat Bank & Trust Co of Chicago (1941)

129 federal appellate · 24 district · 8 state decisions

127019401950196019701980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Appellate journey

reviewedContinental Ins. v. Louisiana Oil Refining Corp. (from Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals)

Relationships

Relies on Pepper v. Litton · Case v. Los Angeles Lumber Products Co. · Securities & Exchange Commission v. United States Realty & Improvement Co. · Taylor v. Standard Gas & Electric Co. · Rogers v. Guaranty Trust Co.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 391 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “A court of equity may in its discretion in the exercise of the jurisdiction committed to it grant or deny relief upon performance of a condition which will safeguard the public interest.”
    16 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “reasonable compensation for services rendered”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. ““* * * The scope of the power of the court embraces denial of compensation to those who have purchased or sold securities during or in contemplation of the proceedings. As in case of reorganizations under former § 77B, 11 U.S.C.A. § 207 , the provision in § 83, sub. b, 11 U.S.C. § 403 (b), 11 U.S.C.A. § 403 , sub. b, for allowance of 'reasonable compensation for ‘services rendered necessarily implies 'loyal and disinterested service in the interests of the persons’ for whom the claimant purported to act. In re Paramount-Publix Corp., D.C., 12 F.Supp. 823 , 828.””
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.