Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 311 U.S. 189 - Helvering v. Janney

Helvering v. Janney’s Empirical Analysis

311 U.S. 189 · 1940

Citation profile

84
cited by 84 later decisions
8
cited 8 times by the Supreme Court
3
states following
January 2010
most recently cited

30 federal appellate · 4 district · 5 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 84 later decisions (8 by the Supreme Court) — most recently January 2010 · most notably Spiegel's Estate v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue (1949), Kavanagh v. Noble (1947)

30 federal appellate · 4 district · 5 state decisions

45019401950196019701980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Appellate journey

reviewedJanney v. Commissioner (from Third Circuit Court of Appeals)

Relationships

Relies on Helvering v. Janney · Stoner v. New York Life Insurance · Janney v. Commissioner · Janney v. Commissioner

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 84 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “it is treated as the return of a taxable unit and the net income disclosed by the return is subject to [tax] * * * as though the return were that of a single individual.”
    4 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “If the income of each [spouse] is included in a single joint return, the tax is computed on the aggregate income and all deductions and credits to which either is entitled shall he taken from such aggregate income. [Emphasis supplied.]”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “The deductions to which either spouse would be entitled would be taken, in the case of a joint return, from the aggregate gross income.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.