Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 311 U.S. 262 - Bowman v. Loperena

Bowman v. Loperena’s Empirical Analysis

311 U.S. 262 · 1940

Citation profile

165
cited by 165 later decisions
22
cited 22 times by the Supreme Court
1
states following
November 2017
most recently cited

118 federal appellate · 4 district · 1 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 165 later decisions (22 by the Supreme Court) — most recently November 2017 · most notably United States v. Healy (1964), Federal Trade Commission v. Minneapolis-Honeywell Regulator Co. (1952)

118 federal appellate · 4 district · 1 state decisions

61019401950196019701980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Appellate journey

reviewedBowman v. Loperena (from Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals)

Relationships

Relies on Wayne United Gas Co. v. Owens-Illinois Glass Co. · Morse v. United States · Voorhees v. John T. Noye Manufacturing Co. · Gypsy Oil Co. v. Escoe

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 165 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[t]he filing of an untimely petition for rehearing which is not entertained or considered on its merits, or a motion for leave to file such a petition out of time, if not acted on or if denied by the trial court, cannot operate to extend the time for appeal. But where the court allows the filing and, after considering the merits, denies the petition, the judgment of the court as originally entered does not become final until such denial, and the time for appeal runs from the date thereof.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.