Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 311 U.S. 435 - Wisconsin v. J. C. Penney Co.

Wisconsin v. J. C. Penney Co.’s Empirical Analysis

311 U.S. 435 · 1940

Citation profile

990
cited by 990 later decisions
169
cited 169 times by the Supreme Court
49
states following
December 2025
most recently cited

60 federal appellate · 12 district · 641 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 990 later decisions (169 by the Supreme Court) — most recently December 2025 · most notably San Antonio Independent School District v. Rodriguez (1973), Complete Auto Transit, Inc. v. Brady (1977)

60 federal appellate · 12 district · 641 state decisions — followed in 49 states

2180194019501960197019801990200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Welch v. Henry · Curry v. McCanless · Lawrence v. State Tax Commission · Underwood Typewriter Co. v. Chamberlain

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 990 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “substantial privilege of carrying on business”
    67 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. ““At best, the responsibility for devising just and productive sources of revenue challenges the wit of legislators. Nothing can be less helpful than for courts to go beyond the extremely limited restrictions that the Constitution places upon the states and to inject themselves in a merely negative way into the delicate processes of fiscal policy-making.” 311 U.S. at 445 , 61 S.Ct. at 250 .”
    6 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “tied to the earnings which the State . . . has made possible'”
    4 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.