Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 312 F.2d 134 - Cook v. Eizenman

Cook v. Eizenman’s Empirical Analysis

312 F.2d 134 · 1963

Citation profile

26
cited by 26 later decisions
March 1989
most recently cited

25 federal appellate ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 26 later decisions — most recently March 1989 · most notably Western Electric Co. v. Milgo Electronic Corp. (1978), United States v. Bear Marine Services (1983)

25 federal appellate ·

180196319701980decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 15 U.S.C. § 77 · 15 U.S.C. § 771 (CAN-SPAM Act of 2003) · 28 U.S.C. § 1292 · 28 U.S.C. § 4

Relies on Catlin v. United States · Susie Parker Nettles and Alvie C. Nettles v. General Accident Fire and Life Assurance Corporation, Limited and Continental Casualty Company · Meadows v. Greyhound Corp. · Reagan v. Traders & General Insurance

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 26 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “is subject to revision at any time before the entry of judgment adjudicating all the claims and the rights and liabilities of all the parties.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.