Battista v. Kenton’s Empirical Analysis
312 F.2d 167 · 1963
Citation profile
5 federal appellate · 2 district ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 14 later decisions — most recently January 2003
5 federal appellate · 2 district ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 18 U.S.C. § 5003
Relies on McNally v. Hill · In re Bonner · Drews v. Maryland · Anderson v. Alabama · Martin v. Davis
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 14 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““It may not be amiss to add that, even if we were to assume arguendo, that, due to some flaw in the joint statutory scheme, Battista is illegally in federal custody, a holding to this effect would not result in his release, but only in his return to Alaska State custody. In re Bonner, 1894, 151 U.S. 242, 259-260 , 14 S.Ct. 323 , 38 L.Ed. 149 .””
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Lee v. Giles
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.