Jarvis v. Ribicoff’s Empirical Analysis
312 F.2d 707 · 1963
Citation profile
49 federal appellate · 7 district ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 84 later decisions — most recently March 1984 · most notably Celebrezze v. Bolas (1963), Miracle v. Celebrezze (1965)
49 federal appellate · 7 district ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Butler v. Flemming · Hall v. Flemming · Ellerman v. Flemming · Randall v. Flemming
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 84 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[The] [t]est of a claimant's disability or inability to engage in any substantial gainful activity is a subjective one and claimant need not establish complete absence of any opportunity for substantial gainful employment and he need only establish that he has become disabled from employment in any work in which he could profitably seek employment in light of his physical and mental capacities and his education, training and experience and he need not be totally helpless or bedridden.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority““[The claimant] was not required by the use of a catalogue of the nation’s industrial occupations to go down the list and verbally negative his capacity for each of them or their availability to him as an aetual opportunity for employment.””
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority““ * * * If he could wash the dishes in the home or perform any similar light duties, that would not constitute substantial gainful activity _ * •» -X ””
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.