Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 312 F.2d 711 - Weiss v. Hunna

Weiss v. Hunna’s Empirical Analysis

312 F.2d 711 · 1963

Citation profile

80
cited by 80 later decisions
2
states following
December 2015
most recently cited

41 federal appellate · 5 district · 2 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 80 later decisions — most recently December 2015 · most notably United States v. Haldeman (1976), New York State National Organization for Women v. Terry (1989)

41 federal appellate · 5 district · 2 state decisions

250196319701980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 28 U.S.C. § 2106 · 28 U.S.C. § 455

Relies on Barr v. Matteo · Cuba Railroad v. Crosby · Gibson v. Phillips Petroleum Co. · Hauser v. Bartow

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 80 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Disqualification ... is generally a matter confided to the conscience of the particular judge.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.