Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

312 F.2d 891

Docket No. 17252.

Lipscomb v. United States

Eighth Circuit Court of Appeals

Decided Jan. 23, 1963.

Eighth Circuit Court of Appeals · decided 1963-01-23

Cited by 3 later decisions — most recently January 1967

3 federal appellate ·

2 counsel of record

Relies on Lipscomb v. United States

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Opinion by (per_curiam) · Decided 1963-01-23

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

¶1*892Robert E. Lipscomb, pro se.

¶2Richard D. Fitzgibbon, U. S. Atty., St. Louis, Mo., for appellee.

¶3Before JOHNSEN, Chief Judge, and MATTHES and RIDGE, Circuit Judges.

¶4PER CURIAM.

¶5For record purposes, the appeal is permitted to be docketed without payment of fee. The motions of appellant for leave to proceed on appeal in forma pauperis and for appointment of counsel are denied, for the reason that the appeal is-frivolous, and it will accordingly be so-dismissed.

¶6The appeal is from the denial of a further motion by appellant to have his conviction and sentence set aside, which is entitled “A Motion in the Nature of a Writ of Habeas Corpus”, but which attempts to raise once more questions previously determined or controlled by the-numerous other legal proceedings in which he has for eleven years been engaging, as referred to in our opinion in. Lipscomb v. United States, 8 Cir., 308 F.2d 420.

¶7Various incidental motions have also been filed by appellant, whose denial is covered by the dismissal made of the appeal as frivolous.

¶8Appeal dismissed.

/312/f2d/891 · .json · Public domain