Espada v. Lugo’s Empirical Analysis
312 F.3d 1 · 2002
Citation profile
28 federal appellate · 30 district ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 67 later decisions — most recently March 2022 · most notably Che v. Massachusetts Bay Transportation Authority (2003), John G. Danielson, Inc. v. Winchester-Conant Properties, Inc. (2003)
28 federal appellate · 30 district ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Andrade v. Jamestown Housing Authority · Wilson Torres v. Ei Dupont De Nemours & Company · Tokyo Marine and Fire Insurance Co Ltd v. Perez & Cia De Puerto Rico Inc · Carreras-Rosa v. Alves-Cruz · Rodriguez-Suris v. Montesinos
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 67 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“‘some outward or physical signs through which the aggrieved party may become aware and realize that [s]he has suffered an injurious aftereffect.'”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“That one-year time clock begins to tick on the day after the date of accrual of the claim ( Carreras-Rosa v. Alves-Cruz , 127 F.3d 172 , 175 (1st Cir.1997, per curiam ) ). Santos Espada v. Cancel Lugo , 312 F.3d 1 , 4-5 (1st Cir.2002). "For accrual purposes, the injured person must have both notice of her injury and knowledge of the likely identity of the tortfeasor ( Tokyo Marine & Fire Ins. Co. v. Perez & Cia., de Puerto Rico, Inc. , 142 F.3d 1 , 3 (1st Cir.1998).)”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“That one-year time clock begins to tick on the day after the date of accrual of the claim ( Carreras-Rosa v. Alves-Cruz , 127 F.3d 172 , 175 (1st Cir.1997, per curiam ) ). Santos Espada v. Cancel Lugo , 312 F.3d 1 , 4-5 (1st Cir.2002).”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.