O'Brien v. M’s Empirical Analysis
Citation profile
4 federal appellate ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 38 later decisions — most recently March 2024 · most notably Christian Legal Society Chapter of University of California v. Wu (2010), Ward v. Circus Circus Casinos, Inc. (2007)
4 federal appellate ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Everett v. Perez · Mitchel v. General Electric Co. · N/s Corporation v. Liberty Mutual Insurance Company · Han Giok Han v. Stanford University · Stevens v. Security Pacific National Bank
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 38 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“failure to comply with Rule 28, by itself, is sufficient ground to justify dismissal of an appeal.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.