Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 312 F.3d 1148 - Cunningham v. Gates

Cunningham v. Gates’s Empirical Analysis

312 F.3d 1148 · 2002

Citation profile

43
cited by 43 later decisions
1
cited 1 times by the Supreme Court
1
states following
February 2017
most recently cited

17 federal appellate · 2 district · 3 state decisions

Relationships

Applies 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (Civil Rights Act of 1871 / Section 1983 (Ku Klux Klan Act))

Relies on Heck v. Humphrey · Ashe v. Swenson · Spencer v. Kemna · 22 Cal. 3d 865 - Clemmer v. Hartford Insurance Co. · Matsushita Electric Industrial Co. v. Epstein

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 43 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “The plaintiff in Smithart tried to use his truck to run over the sheriff and state patrolman, an act for which he was later convicted of assault. The plaintiff claimed that, after he got out of his truck, the sheriff and patrolman used excessive force to arrest him. The assault conviction and the excessive force claim did not arise from the same acts. Indeed, once he was out of the truck and without access to his “assault weapon,” the officers had no need to use excessive force to subdue the plaintiff or to protect themselves. Here, however, there was no break between Cunningham’s provocative act of firing on the police and the police response that he claims was excessive.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “failure timely to pursue habeas remedies”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “intentionally provoked the deadly police response,”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.