Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 312 F.3d 1365 - King v. Moore

King v. Moore’s Empirical Analysis

312 F.3d 1365 · 2002

Citation profile

16
cited by 16 later decisions
1
cited 1 times by the Supreme Court
August 2019
most recently cited

14 federal appellate ·

Relationships

Relies on Mills v. United States · Sterling v. Scott · United States v. Pistone · United States v. McLemore · Clark v. Johnson

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 16 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Nothing in the legislative history indicates to us that Congress decided to pay — by passing money through the federal courts — lawyers to represent defendants in state proceedings. Section 848(q)(4)(B) was added to the bill very late in the session and seemingly without floor debate. The whole business of federal compensation (controlled by federal courts) for lawyers acting in state proceeding on behalf of state prisoners seems too big and innovative to have been dealt with at the tail end of a session as the legislation was being approved at the last moment. We consider it unlikely. The last-minute nature of the amendment and the lack of recorded debate about the issue further clouds our minds that Congress actually intended for section 848(q) to provide counsel, at federal expense, to state prisoners engaged in state proceedings.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “shall represent the defendant throughout every subsequent stage of available judicial proceedings, including the pretrial proceedings, trial, sentencing, motions for new trial, appeals, applications for writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court of the United States, and all available post-conviction process, together with applications for stays of execution and other appropriate motions and procedures, and shall also represent the defendant in such competency proceedings and proceedings for executive or other clemency as may be available to the defendant.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “any proceedings convened under the authority of a State”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.