Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 312 F.3d 256 - Dakuras v. Edwards

Dakuras v. Edwards’s Empirical Analysis

312 F.3d 256 · 2002

Citation profile

15
cited by 15 later decisions
December 2014
most recently cited

4 federal appellate ·

Relationships

Applies 28 U.S.C. § 1359

Relies on Janzen v. Goos · Bontkowski v. Smith · Foster v. Carlin · Ziady v. Curley · Juvelis ex rel. Juvelis v. Snider

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 15 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “The responsibility for making the essential life choices of children and wards is vested not in them but in their parents or guardians, and we cannot see why the choice of domicile should not be treated as one of those life choices.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “leave the incompetent in a never-ending limbo where the presumption against changing domicile becomes more important than the interests of the person the presumption was designed to protect.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.