Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 312 FSUPP 103 - Servisco v. Morreale

Servisco v. Morreale’s Empirical Analysis

1970

Citation profile

5
cited by 5 later decisions
1
states following
January 1985
most recently cited

1 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Rodriguez v. New York · Van Products Co. v. General Welding & Fabricating Co. · Franke v. Wiltschek · Town & Country House & Home Service, Inc. v. Newbery · Carl A. Colteryahn Dairy, Inc. v. Dairy

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “An injunction decree should conform to the requirements of the case; it should give relief from the wrong committed but it should not be so broad as to inflict an unwarranted injury on the defendant. Servisco v. Morreale, 312 F.Supp. 103 (E.D.La. 1970).) See also Goldberg v. Trakas, 206 F.Supp. 867 (E.D.S.C.1962).”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “"Louisiana courts have refused to issue an injunction against solicitation of customers of a former employer where the ex-employee did not use a secret list and merely relied on memory."”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “"To forbid any solicitation of any of Servisco's former customers would be in effect to prevent Morreale from engaging in business in this geographic area."”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.