In Re Taylor’s Empirical Analysis
1988
Citation profile
2 federal appellate · 10 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 34 later decisions — most recently January 2010 · most notably Maryland Division of Labor & Industry v. Triangle General Contractors, Inc. (2001), Maryland Overpak Corporation v. Mayor of Baltimore (2006)
2 federal appellate · 10 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 11 U.S.C. § 522
Relies on Bureau of Mines v. George's Creek Coal and Land Co. · Consumer Protection Division Office of the Attorney General v. Consumer Publishing Co. · Office & Professional Employees International Union, Local 2 v. Mass Transit Administration · Duffy v. Conaway · In Re Special Investigation No. 236
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 34 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Laws shall be passed by the General Assembly, to protect from execution a reasonable amount of the property of the debtor.”
4 later decisions quote this exact passage“the legislative intent in enacting § 11—504(b)(1) emanating bright and clear from the plain language of the subsection. The subsection is a reflection of the constitutional dictate and glows in the light of the past actions of the legislature concerning the exemption statutes. The legislative intent is that any and all wearing apparel, books, tools, instruments, or appliances are exempt from execution on a judgment if they are reasonably necessary for the practice of the debt- or’s trade or profession.”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage“Money payable in the event of sickness, accident, injury, or death of any person, including compensation for loss of future earnings. This exemption includes but is not limited to money payable on account of judgments, arbitrations, compromises, insurance, benefits, compensa tion, and relief. Disability income benefits are not exempt if the judgment is for necessities contracted for after the disability is incurred.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.