State v. Koehler’s Empirical Analysis
1981
Citation profile
2 federal appellate · 1 district · 32 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 35 later decisions — most recently May 2010 · most notably State v. Johnston (1988), 31 Cal. 3d 18 - People v. Shirley (1982)
2 federal appellate · 1 district · 32 state decisions — followed in 17 states
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on State v. MacK · State v. Carlson · Lee v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 35 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[The witness] may not testify to matters adduced at the pretrial hypnotic interview except as such matters were previously and unequivocally disclosed by him to the authorities, prior to the hypnosis.”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage“previously hypnotized witness concerning the subject matter adduced at the pretrial hypnotic interview may not be admitted at a criminal proceeding.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Matter of JRD“there is no suggestion that the State intentionally lost the [evidence] to avoid discovery of evidence beneficial to the defense”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Bailey
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.