Skoglund v. Staab’s Empirical Analysis
1981
Citation profile
1 district · 14 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 15 later decisions — most recently December 2024
1 district · 14 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Mulder v. Tague · Cunningham v. Yankton Clinic, P. A. · National Surety Corporation v. Shoemaker · Sabbagh v. Professional & Business Men's Life Ins. Co. · Peters v. Lohr
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 15 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“The right of trial by jury as declared by article VI, section 6 of the Constitution of South Dakota or as given by a statute of South Dakota shall be preserved to the parties inviolate.” With regard to this statute and the above constitutional provision, we have stated: ‘The right to a jury trial is guaranteed both litigants in Article VI, § 6 of the South Dakota Constitution and SDCL 15-6-38(a), (b).”
3 later decisions quote this exact passagee.g. Kneeland v. Matz · Haberer v. Rice
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.