Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 312 Pa. Super. 85 - Commonwealth v. Davis

312 Pa. Super. 85 - Commonwealth v. Davis’s Empirical Analysis

1983

Citation profile

18
cited by 18 later decisions
1
states following
February 2003
most recently cited

18 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 18 later decisions — most recently February 2003

18 state decisions

100198319902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Commonwealth v. Hubbard · Commonwealth v. Roux · Commonwealth v. New · Commonwealth v. Yobbagy · 265 Pa. Super. 494 - Commonwealth v. Anderson

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 18 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “The facts and circumstances must be considered together with all reasonable inferences arising from them. Commonwealth v. Carter, suprai 272 Pa. Super. 411 , 416 A.2d 523 (1979)]; Commonwealth v. Anderson, 265 Pa. Superior Ct. 494 , 402 A.2d 546 (1979). However, “[w]hen two equally reasonable and mutually inconsistent inferences can be drawn from the same set of circumstances, the jury may not be permitted to guess which inference it will adopt.” Commonwealth v. Hubbard, 472 Pa. 259, 270 , 372 A.2d 687, 692 (1977). See Commonwealth v. Woong Knee New, 354 Pa. 188 , 47 A.2d 450 (1946). “When a party on whom the burden of proof rests in either a criminal or a civil case, offers evidence consistent with two opposing propositions, he proves neither.” Commonwealth v. Anderson, supra 265 Pa.Super. at 500 , 402 A.2d at 548 . Mere suspicion and conjecture do not suffice to sustain a conviction.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.