312 Pa. Super. 92 - Junod v. Bader’s Empirical Analysis
1983
Citation profile
4 federal appellate · 23 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 53 later decisions — most recently April 2016 · most notably Gilles v. Davis (2005), Hilfirty v. Shipman (1996)
4 federal appellate · 23 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on 247 Pa. Super. 99 - Commonwealth v. Kindness · 309 Pa. Super. 202 - Dietrich Industries, Inc. v. Abrams · 251 Pa. Super. 184 - Di Sante v. Russ Financial Co. · 263 Pa. Super. 485 - De Salle v. Penn Central Transportation Co. · 278 Pa. Super. 363 - Commonwealth v. Briley
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 53 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“three essential elements must be proved: “(lXthat the underlying proceedings terminated favorably to the [plaintiff]; (2) that the defendant caused those proceed ings to be instituted without probable cause; and (3) malice.””
1 later decision quote this exact passage“terminated in a manner 'consistent with innocence, such as acquittal or reversal of conviction.'”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Hilfirty v. Shipman
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.