Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 312 SC 135 - Blake v. Cannon

Blake v. Cannon’s Empirical Analysis

1993

Citation profile

2
cited by 2 later decisions
1
states following
November 1998
most recently cited

2 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Noisette v. Ismail · Petition of Crum · Caughman v. Caughman · Wilkie v. Philadelphia Life Insurance · Rankin v. Superior Auto. Ins. Co. of Florence

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “1. The attorney must preserve or protect a common fund; 2. The attorney’s services must have aided in creating, preserving or protecting the fund, and the services must prove fruitful to the general class; and 3. There must be a principle of representation or agency as in a class suit, that is, before one may be allowed compensation out of a common fund belonging to others for services rendered on behalf of the common interest there must be a contract of employment, either expressly made or superinduced by the law upon the facts.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.