Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 312 S.C. 4 - Drayton v. Evatt

Drayton v. Evatt’s Empirical Analysis

1993

Citation profile

34
cited by 34 later decisions
2
cited 2 times by the Supreme Court
1
states following
October 2010
most recently cited

7 federal appellate · 23 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 34 later decisions (2 by the Supreme Court) — most recently October 2010 · most notably Al-Shabazz v. State (2000), Kornahrens v. Evatt (1995)

7 federal appellate · 23 state decisions

160199320002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Strickland v. Washington · Gregory Lumber Co. v. United States · Skipper v. South Carolina · Cherek v. United States · 111 S. Ct. 425 - Insurance Co. of Pennsylvania v. Ben Cooper, Inc.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 34 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “In favorem vitae review requires us to painstakingly inspect capital cases to determine whether prejudicial error has been committed in a trial irrespective of whether an assignment of error has been made by the defendant.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “[E]rrors which can be reviewed on direct appeal may not be asserted for the first time, or reasserted, in post-conviction proceedings.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.