Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 312 S.C. 444 - Miller v. Doe

Miller v. Doe’s Empirical Analysis

1994

Citation profile

43
cited by 43 later decisions
1
states following
March 2018
most recently cited

43 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 43 later decisions — most recently March 2018 · most notably City of Sumter Police Department v. One (1) 1992 Blue Mazda Truck (1998), Tilley v. Pacesetter Corp. (2003)

43 state decisions

230199420002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Citizens for Lee County, Inc. v. Lee County · Wynn Ex Rel. Wynn v. Doe · Chestnut v. South Carolina Farm Bureau Mutual Insurance

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 43 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “If the owner or operator of any motor vehicle which causes bodily injury or property damage to the insured is unknown, there is no right of action or recovery under the uninsured motorist provision, unless: (1) the insured or someone in his behalf has reported the accident to some appropriate police authority within a reasonable time, under all the circumstances, after its occurrence; (2) the injury or damage was caused by physical contact with the unknown vehicle, or the accident must have been witnessed by someone other than the owner or operator of the insured vehicle; provided however, the witness must sign an affidavit attesting to the truth of the facts of the accident contained in the affidavit; (3) the insured was not negligent in failing to determine the identity of the other vehicle and the driver of the other vehicle at the time of the accident.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “If a statute's language is plain and unambiguous and conveys a clear and definite meaning, there is no occasion for employing rules of statutory interpretation and the court has no right to look for or impose another meaning.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. “In determining the meaning of a statute, the terms used therein must be taken in their ordinary and popular meaning, nothing to the contrary appearing.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.