State v. Oliveaux’s Empirical Analysis
1975
Citation profile
1,892 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 1,899 later decisions — most recently July 2019 · most notably State v. Weiland (1990), 953 So. 2d 890 - State v. Lathan (2007)
1,892 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on State v. Sanford · 307 So. 2d 342 - State v. Craddock · State v. Picou · 275 So. 2d 396 - State v. Luquette · 305 So. 2d 108 - City of Monroe v. Fincher
Cited together with Jackson v. Virginia · State v. Weiland · Boykin v. Alabama · Anders v. California · Miranda v. State of Arizona Vignera
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 1,899 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“discoverable by a mere inspection of the pleadings and proceedings and without inspection of the evidence.”
13 later decisions quote this exact passage“[w]hoever commits the crime of armed robbery shall be imprisoned at hard labor for not less than ten years and not more than ninety-nine years, without benefit of parole, probation, or suspension of sentence.”
10 later decisions quote this exact passage“A. Manufacture; distribution. Except as authorized by this Part, it shall be unlawful for any person knowingly or intentionally: (1) To produce, manufacture, distribute or dispense or possess with intent to produce, manufacture, distribute, or dispense, a controlled dangerous substance or controlled substance analogue classified in Schedule I; [[Image here]] B. Penalties for violation of Subsection A of this Section. Any person who violates Subsection A of this Section with respect to: [[Image here]] (3)A substance classified in Schedule I which is marijuana ... shall upon conviction be sentenced to a term of imprisonment at hard labor for not less than five nor more than thirty years, and pay a fine of not more than fifty thousand dollars.”
7 later decisions quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.