State v. Williams’s Empirical Analysis
2010
Citation profile
1
cited by 1 later decisions
1
states following
May 2011
most recently cited
1 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Terry v. Ohio · Schneckloth v. Bustamonte · Bell v. Wolfish · Adams v. Williams · Delaware v. Prouse
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 1 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“(1) whether the consenting person was in custody; (2) whether the suspect was arrested at gunpoint; (3) whether the suspect had the option of refusing consent; (4) the constitutional advice given to the suspect; (5) the length of detention; (6) the repetitiveness of the questioning; and (7) the use of physical punishment” as well as the suspect's age, intelligence, and education). . State v. Kelly, 204 S.W.3d 808, 820-21 (Tex.Crim.App.2006). In Kelly , the defendant argued that she”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Meekins v. State
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.