Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 312 U.S. 377 - Kelleam v. Maryland Casualty Co.

Kelleam v. Maryland Casualty Co.’s Empirical Analysis

312 U.S. 377 · 1941

Citation profile

245
cited by 245 later decisions
6
cited 6 times by the Supreme Court
4
states following
February 2018
most recently cited

125 federal appellate · 34 district · 14 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 245 later decisions (6 by the Supreme Court) — most recently February 2018 · most notably Meredith v. City of Winter Haven (1943), Angel v. Bullington (1947)

125 federal appellate · 34 district · 14 state decisions

70019411950196019701980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Appellate journey

reviewedKelleam v. Maryland Casualty Co. of Baltimore (from Tenth Circuit Court of Appeals)

Relationships

Relies on Kline v. Burke Construction Co. · Penn General Casualty Co v. Commonwealth of Pennsylvania Schnader · Pennsylvania v. Williams · Pusey & Jones Co. v. Hanssen · Sutton v. English

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 245 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “* * * that a federal court of equity should not appoint a receiver where the appointment is not a remedy auxiliary to some primary relief which is sought and which equity may appropriately grant.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. ““In the last named case, Justice Douglas, speaking to the facts in that case, said that once the bill of complaint was dismissed no jurisdiction remained for any grant of relief under the cross petition. But in that case there was no jurisdictional basis for the counterclaim independent of the main action.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “A receivership is only a means to reach some legitimate end sought through the exercise of the power of a court of equity. It is not an end in itself.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.