Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 312 U.S. 510 - Consolidated Rock Products Co. v. Du Bois

Consolidated Rock Products Co. v. Du Bois’s Empirical Analysis

312 U.S. 510 · 1941

Citation profile

880
cited by 880 later decisions
64
cited 64 times by the Supreme Court
8
states following
January 2019
most recently cited

293 federal appellate · 56 district · 32 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 880 later decisions (64 by the Supreme Court) — most recently January 2019 · most notably Vanston Bondholders Protective Committee v. Green (1946), Protective Committee for Independent Stockholders of TMT Trailer Ferry, Inc. v. Anderson (1968)

293 federal appellate · 56 district · 32 state decisions

307019411950196019701980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Appellate journey

reviewedDu Bois v. Consolidated Rock Products Co. (from Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals)

Relationships

Relies on Pepper v. Litton · Case v. Los Angeles Lumber Products Co. · Northern Pacific Railway Co. v. Boyd · Taylor v. Standard Gas & Electric Co.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 880 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Since its application requires a prediction as to what will occur in the future, an estimate, as distinguished from mathematical certitude, is all that can be made. But that estimate must be based on an informed judgment which embraces all facts relevant to future earning capacity and hence to present worth, including, of course, the nature and condition of the properties, the past earnings record, and all circumstances which indicate whether or not that record is a reliable criterion of future performance.””
    38 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.