Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 312 U.S. 531 - Helvering v. Le Gierse

Helvering v. Le Gierse’s Empirical Analysis

312 U.S. 531 · 1941

Citation profile

453
cited by 453 later decisions
17
cited 17 times by the Supreme Court
16
states following
May 2022
most recently cited

151 federal appellate · 15 district · 75 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 453 later decisions (17 by the Supreme Court) — most recently May 2022 · most notably 21 Cal. 4th 28 - Cates Construction, Inc. v. Talbot Partners (1999), Securities and Exchange Commission v. United Benefit Life Insurance Company (1967)

151 federal appellate · 15 district · 75 state decisions — followed in 16 states

950194119501960197019801990200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Appellate journey

reviewedCommissioner v. Le Gierse (from Second Circuit Court of Appeals)

Relationships

Relies on Ritter v. Mutual Life Ins Co of New York · Legg v. St. John · Pearson v. McGraw · Helvering v. McIlvaine

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 453 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[h]istorically and commonly insurance involves risk-shifting and risk-distributing.”
    17 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “[A]nnuities and insurance are opposites; in combination the one neutralizes the risk customarily inherent in the other ... insurance looks to longevity, annuity to transiency.”
    12 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. ““ * * * Any risk that the prepayment would earn less than the amount paid to respondent as an annuity was an investment risk similar to the risk assumed by a bank; it was not an insurance risk as explained above. * * * ””
    5 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.