Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 313 A.2d 139 - Halpern v. Barran

Halpern v. Barran’s Empirical Analysis

1973

Citation profile

34
cited by 34 later decisions
2
states following
June 2017
most recently cited

5 federal appellate · 9 district · 13 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 34 later decisions — most recently June 2017 · most notably Muller v. Thaut (1988), In Re Tyson Foods, Inc. Consolidated Shareholder Litigation (2007)

5 federal appellate · 9 district · 13 state decisions

10019731980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Bovay v. H. M. Byllesby & Co. · 408 & 410 King Street v. Wilmington Housing Authority · Mastellone v. Argo Oil Corp. · Nardo v. Guido DeAscanis & Sons, Inc. · Wise v. Delaware Steeplechase & Race Ass'n

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 34 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[w]here there has been fraudulent concealment from a plaintiff, the statute is suspended only until his rights are discovered or until they could have been discovered by the exercise of reasonable diligence.”
    4 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “extraordinary cases which involve, as a minimum, allegations of fraudulent self-dealing,”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. “not alleged that any of the individual defendants personally profited from breaches of fiduciary duty which they are said to have committed,”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.