Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 313 ARK 399 - Tarkington v. State

Tarkington v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1993

Citation profile

19
cited by 19 later decisions
1
states following
January 2019
most recently cited

19 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 19 later decisions — most recently January 2019

19 state decisions

70199320002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Doyle v. Ohio · Greer v. Miller · Spallone v. United States · McIntosh v. State · Smith v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 19 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “A person commits robbery if, with the purpose of committing a felony or misdemeanor theft or resisting apprehension immediately thereafter, he employs or threatens to immediately employ physical force upon another.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “the Due Process Clause bars ‘the use for impeachment purposes’ of a defendant's postarrest silence.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.