Partenweederei, Ms Belgrano, and Rudolph A. Oetker v. George Weigel, Brady-Hamilton Stevedore Company v. Partenweederei, Ms Belgrano, and Rudolph A. Oetker’s Empirical Analysis
313 F.2d 423 · 1962
Citation profile
16 federal appellate · 1 district ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 19 later decisions — most recently April 2003
16 federal appellate · 1 district ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on North Carolina Natural Gas Corp. v. McJunkin Corp. · International Brotherhood of Teamsters, Chauffeurs, Warehousemen & Helpers, Local Union No. 25 v. W. L. Mead, Inc. · Leslie v. Houston Natural Gas Corp. · Higa v. Transocean Airlines · United States v. Anglin & Stevenson
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 19 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““It is sound policy to require that all claims be presented to the trial court, and not raised for the first time on appeal, nor, a fortiori, as herein, in a petition for rehearing on appeal. This requirement sets the scope of the lawsuit, thereby preventing piecemeal litigation and consequent waste of the time of both trial and appellate courts. It assures that the opposing party will know the claims he must meet. It gives the appellate court the benefit of the district court’s wisdom, and it prevents a litigant from asserting before this Court a claim which he deliberately chose, for reasons of strategy, not to assert below. We find here no persuasive reason for making an exception.””
3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.