Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 313 F.2d 425 - Twitchell v. United States

Twitchell v. United States’s Empirical Analysis

313 F.2d 425 · 1963

Citation profile

31
cited by 31 later decisions
February 2008
most recently cited

31 federal appellate ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 31 later decisions — most recently February 2008 · most notably United States v. Roselli (1970), Lyda v. United States (1963)

31 federal appellate ·

15019631970198019902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 18 U.S.C. § 2 · 18 U.S.C. § 871 (Presidential Threat Protection Act of 2000)

Relies on Kotteakos v. United States · Pereira v. United States · Krulewitch v. United States · Nye & Nissen v. United States · Schaffer v. United States

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 31 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““1. he directly agreed to the illegal interstate transportation, or directly agreed to a scheme which could not be consummated without illegal interstate transportation, or directly agreed to a scheme in which it was known that the likelihood of illegal interstate transportation was great * * * or 2. he evidenced his indirect agreement by substantial participation in the scheme with actual knowledge of the proposed, or completed, illegal interstate transportation.””
    4 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the concurrence
  2. ““Whoever knowingly transports in interstate or foreign commerce, . . . any woman or girl for the purpose of prostitution or debauchery, or for any other immoral purpose, or with the intent and purpose to induce, entice, or compel such woman or girl to become a prostitute or to give herself up to debauchery, or to engage in any other immoral practice; or “Whoever knowingly procures or obtains any ticket or tickets, or any form of transportation or evidence of the right thereto, to be used by any woman or girl in interstate or foreign commerce, ... in going to any place for the purpose of prostitution or debauchery. . “Shall be fined not more than $5,000 or imprisoned not more than five years, or both.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the concurrence

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.