Green v. United States’s Empirical Analysis
313 F.2d 6 · 1963
Citation profile
14 federal appellate · 4 district ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 21 later decisions — most recently June 1993
14 federal appellate · 4 district ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 18 U.S.C. § 2113
Relies on Napue v. People of the State of Illinois · Hill v. United States · Mooney v. Holohan · MacHibroda v. United States · Heflin v. United States
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 21 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““It is to be noted that we are not dealing here with a case where the defendant was affirmatively denied an opportunity to speak during the hearing at which his sentence was imposed. * * * Indeed, there is no claim that the defendant would have had anything at all to say if he had been formally invited to speak. Whether § 2255 relief would be available if a violation of Rule 32(a) occurred in the context of other aggravating circumstances is a’ question we therefore do not consider.””
3 later decisions quote this exact passage“of several matters unknown to [petitioner's] counsel which would have corrected false impressions implanted in the mind of the court by remarks of the assistant district attorney.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.