Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 313 F.2d 757 - United States v. Glaze

United States v. Glaze’s Empirical Analysis

313 F.2d 757 · 1963

Citation profile

80
cited by 80 later decisions
5
states following
October 2017
most recently cited

51 federal appellate · 6 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 80 later decisions — most recently October 2017 · most notably United States v. Walsh (1999), United States v. Bortnovsky (1987)

51 federal appellate · 6 state decisions

370196319701980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Roviaro v. United States · Stern v. Board of Levee Commissioners · Bandy v. United States · Pressed Steel Car Co. v. United States · International Ass'n of Machinists, Lodge 942 v. National Labor Relations Board

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 80 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “strictly limited to proving what it has set forth in it.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “it is well settled that a variance between the proof and the bill of particulars is not grounds for reversal unless the [defendant] is prejudiced by the variance.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. ““Courts must therefore view with suspicion attempts by parties to adduce proof of facts which modify or contradict assertions recorded in their bill of particulars.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.