Pearson v. United States

Tenth Circuit Court of Appeals

Decided Jan. 30, 1963.

Tenth Circuit Court of Appeals · decided 1963-01-30

Cited by 6 later decisions — most recently October 1963

6 federal appellate ·

2 counsel of record

Relies on Prince v. United States

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Opinion by (per_curiam) · Decided 1963-01-30

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

¶1Blaine A. Rutenbeck, Denver, Colo., for appellant.

¶2Jack R. Parr, Asst. U. S. Atty. (B. Andrew Potter, U. S. Atty., was with him on the brief), for appellee.

¶3Before BREITENSTEIN, HILL and SETH, Circuit; Judges.

¶4PER CURIAM.

¶5The trial court denied appellant’s petition to secure at government expense certain records and transcripts of his trial proceedings. The time for appeal has passed and no application for post conviction relief is pending. The denial conforms with the decision in Prince v. United States. 10 Cir.. 312 F.2d 252, decided December 11, 1962. Affirmed.