Vandergrift v. United States’s Empirical Analysis
313 F.2d 93 · 1963
Citation profile
17 federal appellate · 3 district · 1 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 25 later decisions — most recently August 1997 · most notably United States v. Schlesinger (1994), Raymond L. Buckelew and James Laney Jenkins v. United States of America, Judson Lee Drane v. United States (1978)
17 federal appellate · 3 district · 1 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996)
Relies on Escoe v. Zerbst · Sunal v. Large · Nelson v. County of Los Angeles · Forman v. United States · Sunal v. Large
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 25 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“convert what was otherwise a fair trial into one which is repugnant to an enlightened system of justice.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Perez v. Goldsmith“does not ipso facto fasten the taint of partiality, in the Sixth Amendment sense, upon a jury”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Diplarakos v. Poole“necessarily transform an otherwise fair trial into one which offends ... due process.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Diplarakos v. Poole
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.