Park v. Shin’s Empirical Analysis
313 F.3d 1138 · 2002
Citation profile
8 federal appellate · 6 district ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 31 later decisions — most recently March 2022 · most notably Doe v. See (2009), Enahoro Cd Mko v. Abubakar (2005)
8 federal appellate · 6 district ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Republic of Argentina v. Weltover, Inc. · Yates v. Gober · Texas v. Cobb · Hilao v. Estate of Marcos · Joseph v. Office of the Consulate General of Nigeria
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 31 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[a] foreign state shall not be immune from the jurisdiction of courts of the United States or of the States in any case ... in which the action is based upon a commercial activity carried on in the United States by the foreign state; or upon an act performed in the United States in connection with a commercial activity of the foreign state elsewhere; or upon an act outside the territory of the United States in connection with a commercial activity of the foreign state elsewhere and that act causes a direct effect in the United States.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“the existence of sovereign immunity and subject matter jurisdiction under the [FSIA]”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“a contract to purchase military supplies, although clearly undertaken for public use, is commercial in nature....”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.