Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 313 F.3d 144 - Forbes

Forbes’s Empirical Analysis

Citation profile

50
cited by 50 later decisions
1
states following
June 2023
most recently cited

1 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 50 later decisions — most recently June 2023 · most notably McKee, Schieber

1 state decisions

250200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Anderson v. Creighton · Cohen v. Beneficial Industrial Loan Corp. · Mitchell v. Forsyth · Duncan v. Walker · SAUCIER v. KATZ Et Al.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 50 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “require[s] the District Courts to specify those material facts that are and are not subject to genuine dispute and explain their materiality.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
    e.g. 354 F. Supp. 2d 563 - Brockington v. City of Philadelphia · Springer v. Henry
  2. “consider whether the district court correctly identified the set of facts that the summary judgment record is sufficient to prove.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
    e.g. Schieber · McKee
  3. “[R]igid adherence to Saucier departs from the general rule of constitutional avoidance.”). 10 . Forbes v. Twp. of Lower Merion, 313 F.3d 144 , 149 (3d Cir. 2002) (“[Djispositions of a motion in which a party pleads qualified immunity include, at minimum, an identification of relevant factual issues and an analysis of the law that justifies the ruling with respect to those issues.”); see also Grant v. City of Pittsburgh, 98 F.3d 116, 123 (3d Cir. 1996) (”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
    e.g. Matthew Conte v. Jose Rios

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.