Quick Technologies, Inc. v. Sage Group PLC’s Empirical Analysis
313 F.3d 338 · 2002
Citation profile
26 federal appellate · 5 district · 1 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 100 later decisions (1 by the Supreme Court) — most recently April 2025 · most notably Purdue Research Foundation v. Sanofi-Synthelabo, S.A. (2003), Bridas S.A.P.I.C. v. Government of Turkmenistan (2003)
26 federal appellate · 5 district · 1 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Champion Spark Plug Co. v. Sanders · Wilson v. Belin · ALPO Petfoods, Inc. v. Ralston Purina Co. · Mink v. AAAA Development LLC · George Basch Co. v. Blue Coral, Inc.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 100 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“include, but are not limited to (1) whether the defendant had the intent to confuse or deceive, (2) whether sales have been diverted, (3) the adequacy of other remedies, (4) any unreasonable delay by the plaintiff in asserting his rights, (5) the public interest in making the misconduct unprofitable, and (6) whether it is a case of palming off.”
5 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“In making its determination, the district court may consider the contents of the record before the court at the time of the motion, including 'affidavits, interrogatories, depositions, oral testimony, or any combination of the recognized methods of discovery.'”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“When the district court rules on a motion to dismiss for lack of personal jurisdiction 'without an evidentiary hearing, the plaintiff may bear his burden by presenting a prima facie case that personal jurisdiction is proper.'”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.