United States v. McCoy’s Empirical Analysis
313 F.3d 561 · 2002
Citation profile
15 federal appellate · 3 district ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 27 later decisions — most recently May 2022 · most notably United States v. Angeles-Mendoza (2005), Al Bahlul v. United States (2014)
15 federal appellate · 3 district ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Johnson v. United States · United Sav. Assn. of Tex. v. Timbers of Inwood Forest Associates, Ltd. · Soberon v. United States · Brewster v. Derwinski · Burns v. United States
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 27 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[U]pon a resentencing occasioned by a remand, unless the court of appeals expressly directs otherwise, the district court may consider only such new arguments or new facts as are made newly relevant by the court of appeals' decision — whether by the reasoning or by the result.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the dissent“the district court's action on remand renders the contention determinative,”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.