Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 313 F.3d 724 - Dunham v. Travis

Dunham v. Travis’s Empirical Analysis

313 F.3d 724 · 2002

Citation profile

95
cited by 95 later decisions
2
states following
July 2022
most recently cited

11 federal appellate · 1 district · 3 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 95 later decisions — most recently July 2022 · most notably Cotto v. Herbert (2003), Eze v. Senkowski (2003)

11 federal appellate · 1 district · 3 state decisions

620200220102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Strickland v. Washington · Coleman v. Thompson · Murray v. Carrier · Schlup v. Delo · Bousley v. United States

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 95 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[w]hether to engage in cross examination, and if so to what extent and in what matter, are ... strategic in nature' and generally will not support an ineffective assistance claim.' Dunham v. Travis , 313 F.3d 724 , 732 (2nd Cir.2002).”
    4 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “[A] habeas petitioner may also bypass the independent and adequate state ground bar by demonstrating a constitutional violation that resulted in a fundamental miscarriage of justice, i.e., that he is actually innocent of the crime for which he has been convicted.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “'[A]ctual innocence' means factual innocence, not mere legal insufficiency.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.