Taylor v. Vermont Department of Education’s Empirical Analysis
313 F.3d 768 · 2002
Citation profile
44 federal appellate · 24 district · 4 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 203 later decisions — most recently April 2024 · most notably McCarthy v. Dun & Bradstreet Corp. (2007), Js Ns Sh Ch Jh Cz Kz Se v. Attica Central Schools
44 federal appellate · 24 district · 4 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Anderson v. Creighton · Santosky v. Kramer · Swierkiewicz v. Sorema N. A. · Cannon v. University of Chicago · Auer v. Robbins
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 203 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“(a) General. As used in this part, the term parent means— (1) A natural or adoptive parent of a child; (2) A guardian but not the State if the child is a ward of the State; (3) A person acting in the place of a parent (such as a grandparent or stepparent with whom the child lives, or a person who is legally responsible for the child’s welfare); or (4) A surrogate parent who has been appointed in accordance with § 300.515.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“Exhaustion of the administrative process allows for the exercise of discretion and educational expertise by state and local agencies, affords full exploration of technical educational issues, furthers development of a complete factual record, and promotes judicial efficiency by giving these agencies the first opportunity to correct shortcomings in their educational programs for disabled children.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“[B]efore the filing of a civil action under such laws seeking relief that is also available under this subchapter, the procedures under subsections (f) and (g) shall be exhausted to the same extent as would be required had the action been brought under this subchapter.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.