Scirex Corporation v. Federal Insurance Company’s Empirical Analysis
313 F.3d 841 · 2002
Citation profile
9 federal appellate · 5 district · 3 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Appalachian Insurance Company v. Liberty Mutual Insurance Company · The Medical Protective Company v. William Watkins · University of Maryland at Baltimore v. Peat Marwick Main & Co. · Mortgage Corp. of NJ v. Aetna Cas. & Surety Co. · Jefferson Bank v. Progressive Casualty Insurance
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 21 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““[D]irect cause” or “immediate cause” is a nebulous and largely indeterminate concept, and one that does not enjoy favor under Pennsylvania law. As we have suggested, Pennsylvania, consistent with general notions of proximate causation, requires that plaintiffs in negligence cases show substantiality, rather than immediacy, in order to demonstrate proximate cause.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“[T]he accepted purpose of defining `an occurrence or event' is to limit liability, and in the insurance industry `occurrence' is commonly understood to mean all loss caused by a single act or related events.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.