Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 313 F.3d 841 - Scirex Corporation v. Federal Insurance Company

Scirex Corporation v. Federal Insurance Company’s Empirical Analysis

313 F.3d 841 · 2002

Citation profile

21
cited by 21 later decisions
3
states following
July 2018
most recently cited

9 federal appellate · 5 district · 3 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Appalachian Insurance Company v. Liberty Mutual Insurance Company · The Medical Protective Company v. William Watkins · University of Maryland at Baltimore v. Peat Marwick Main & Co. · Mortgage Corp. of NJ v. Aetna Cas. & Surety Co. · Jefferson Bank v. Progressive Casualty Insurance

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 21 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““[D]irect cause” or “immediate cause” is a nebulous and largely indeterminate concept, and one that does not enjoy favor under Pennsylvania law. As we have suggested, Pennsylvania, consistent with general notions of proximate causation, requires that plaintiffs in negligence cases show substantiality, rather than immediacy, in order to demonstrate proximate cause.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “[T]he accepted purpose of defining `an occurrence or event' is to limit liability, and in the insurance industry `occurrence' is commonly understood to mean all loss caused by a single act or related events.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.