Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 313 F.3d 948 - Ritchie v. Rogers

Ritchie v. Rogers’s Empirical Analysis

313 F.3d 948 · 2002

Citation profile

22
cited by 22 later decisions
1
cited 1 times by the Supreme Court
1
states following
March 2015
most recently cited

11 federal appellate · 1 district · 1 state decisions

Appellate journey

Relationships

Applies 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996)

Relies on Williams v. Taylor · Irvin v. Dowd · Smith v. Phillips · Sheppard v. Maxwell · Nebraska Press Assn. v. Stuart

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 22 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “We have said that: When the motion for a change of venue based on extensive pretrial publicity and predicated on “presumed prejudice” fails, the issue of “actual prejudice” remains for review by the trial court to determine whether a review of both the jury voir dire testimony and the extent and nature of the media coverage indicates a fair trial is or is not possible.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “To hold that the mere existence of any preconceived notion as to the guilt or innocence of an accused, without more, is sufficient to rebut the presumption of a prospective juror’s impartiality would be to establish an impossible standard. It is sufficient if the juror can lay aside his impression or opinion and render verdict based on the evidence presented court.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.